Dartmouth College V Woodward Outcome

Trustees of dartmouth college v.

Dartmouth college v woodward outcome. Upholds the sanctity of contracts. Considered a landmark ruling in the development of u s. Under its charter dartmouth college was a private and not a public corporation. The ruling of dartmouth v.

The court s decision confirmed that the u s. The supreme court sided with dartmouth college in 1819 in dartmouth college v. In doing so the court ratified the college s claim that the state government violated article 1 section 10 of the constitution by interfering in a private contract. The outcome of the dartmouth college case cemented the concept into united states constitutional law already present in english common law that private charitable organizations serve the public good.

Woodward 1819 held that the college would remain a private institution and not become a state university. 4 wheat 518 1819 was a landmark decision in united states corporate law from the united states supreme court dealing with the application of the contracts clause of the united states constitution to private corporations. The court ruled that the charter was protected under the contract clause of the u. An act of the state legislature of new hampshire altering the charter without the consent of the corporation in a material respect is an act impairing the obligation of the charter and is unconstitutional and void.

Woodward 1819 he maintained that a state s grant of a charter to do business was a contract that the state could not impair. Constitutional and corporate law trustees of dartmouth college v. In dartmouth college v. In dartmouth college v.

Woodward who sided with the new appointees. Woodward as noted by the american bar association. The legislature changed the school s corporate charter by transferring the control of trustee appointments to the governor. 481 1819 the supreme court ruled that the state of new hampshire had violated the contract clause in its attempt to install a new board of trustees for dartmouth college.

Constitution s contract clause prohibits states from impairing a contract in this case dartmouth s charter. In an attempt to regain authority over the resources of dartmouth college the old trustees filed suit against william h. Maryland 1819 he contended that a state could not tax a federal agency a branch of. For one it obviously meant that the new charter was invalid and that the state government of new hampshire could not force dartmouth.